Tom Lane wrote:
> Jose Soares <jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com> writes:
> > SELECT...HAVING, this last for example doesn't work.
> That's a rather strong statement, and in fact a provably false one.
> How about a detailed bug report rather than "it doesn't work"?
> > SELECT ... UNION (is 3 / 4 times slow)
> Can't help you on that without more details, either. What is the
> query exactly, what plan does EXPLAIN show, and what plan did you
> get from 6.5?
> regards, tom lane
Bologna, Italy Jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com
Description: text/plain (971 bytes)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2000-02-28 15:52:03|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0|
|Previous:||From: Oleg Broytmann||Date: 2000-02-28 15:40:09|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Locale support broken in latest snapshots |