> I totally see what you're saying and I'm going to try
> to address it. But there was noone who said anything
> about this so far.
OK, an overdue comment: the new psql is great (current and future
discrepencies excepted of course ;)
Thanks for sticking with it Peter; we've already got a good
foundation, and as we stumble across these minor differences in
behavior it will get even closer to an ideal interface.
My current favorite feature: command history across psql sessions.
When testing I can jump in and out of psql after rebuilding the
backend and can just uparrow to my last test command. Nice. And for
this case, I won't complain about a lack of backward compatibility :))
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Don Baccus||Date: 2000-02-01 02:43:03|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-02-01 02:37:32|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] request for tuning suggestions from PC Week Labs |