Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> If the code works or can be made workable we should integrate it imho.
> There is not likely to be any good excuse to keep out an
> SQL92-compliant type.
Nobody else replied, so I guess we can go ahead. Let me know if there is
anything I can do, or you need any explanations to the code, etc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-01-30 15:41:13|
|Subject: Another nasty cache problem|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-01-30 06:32:51|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? |