Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Per-database search_path

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Per-database search_path
Date: 2006-09-29 21:41:35
Message-ID: 3892.1159566095@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 01:06:09PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> However, it almost seems like this would become a piece of the other
>> per-database-user stuff we'd like to do, like "local superuser".

> I'm not sure that's the same.  The thing about superuser as it exists
> now is the ability to write to the filesystem, which means that
> there's no boundary really possible.

Yeah.  ISTM the correct generalization is "per-user per-database default
GUC settings", which has nothing to do with superuserness.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-09-29 21:55:23
Subject: Re: Win32 hard crash problem
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-09-29 21:34:30
Subject: Re: Faster StrNCpy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group