john huttley wrote:
> > I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible. We are
> > working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins.
> > Anything else?
> Yes, earlier in the year I was trying to migrate from Pervasive SQL to
> posgtres and
> came to a screaming halt when it wouldn't do a large view. Exceeded some
> sort of internal buffer
> or rule area. I dont recall the details, although the mail archive will have
This will be fixed by Jan's new compressed type and the long fields in a second
table. So in about 6 months time.
The one we still need is views on UNION's...
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Adam Szeliga||Date: 1999-12-27 12:59:33|
|Subject: The process ID of the backend ?|
|Previous:||From: Karel Zak - Zakkr||Date: 1999-12-27 11:46:17|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL|