Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL

From: Ed Loehr <ELOEHR(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Date: 1999-12-25 23:23:26
Message-ID: 386551EE.7E6B3140@austin.rr.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > My big question is, what new challenges will we face as we
> > become more > popular?
> >
> > The 3 greatest technical/engineering challenges: 1) system
> > reliability & recoverability, 2) system reliability & recoverability,
> > and 3) system reliability and recoverability. The masses won't
> > stay long if the system won't stay up, isn't easy to diagnose
> > by non-experts, or cannot be easily restored from backups without
> > significant data losses. New functionality is great, but a
> > system that won't stay up consistently is approaching worthlessness
> > for mission-critical 24x7 applications. And if the masses
> > leave because of system reliability problems, you can be very,
> > very certain about what they will tell their friends and coworkers.
>
> And we don't have a problem in this area, do we?

Please tell me you're kidding.

Cheers,
Ed Loehr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-12-26 00:13:26 Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Previous Message Ed Loehr 1999-12-25 23:22:27 Re: [GENERAL] DBI::Pg for Perl?