| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jim Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] number of transactions doubling |
| Date: | 2006-09-29 21:39:17 |
| Message-ID: | 3851.1159565957@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc |
"Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com> writes:
> Does the presence of an exception clause generate subtransactions
> regardless of whether exceptions occurred? If so, do subtransactions
> count towards the transaction id wraparound limit counter?
Yes, and yes.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sriram Dandapani | 2006-09-29 21:42:54 | Re: autovacuum ignore tables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-29 21:38:07 | Re: autovacuum ignore tables |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikael Carneholm | 2006-09-29 21:39:21 | Re: FAQ update about transaction interleaving |
| Previous Message | Sriram Dandapani | 2006-09-29 18:31:11 | Re: [JDBC] number of transactions doubling |