Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Referencial integrity - Re: Is PostgreSQL ready formission criti calapplications?

From: Stephen Birch <sbirch(at)ironmountainsystems(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Andrzej Mazurkiewicz <andrzej(dot)mazurkiewicz(at)polkomtel(dot)com(dot)pl>, "'marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de'" <marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Referencial integrity - Re: Is PostgreSQL ready formission criti calapplications?
Date: 1999-11-25 20:22:35
Message-ID: 383D9A8B.EFBAB14C@ironmountainsystems.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
How is the referential integrety project progressing?

Any time soon?


Steve


The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Andrzej Mazurkiewicz wrote:
>
> > Not using reference integrity tools (triggers, constrains) is in log-term a
> > very dangerous practice.
>
> Wait, we support both triggers and contraints though...
>
> Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
> ************


In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Jaco de GrootDate: 1999-11-25 20:36:01
Subject: drop/rename table and transactions
Previous:From: Moray McConnachieDate: 1999-11-25 18:44:54
Subject: problems on INSERTS via ODBC?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group