| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-13 14:50:41 |
| Message-ID: | 3830.960907841@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
>> encrypt pg_shadow passwords
> This will be for 7.1? For some reason I thought it was being pushed
> off to 7.2.
I don't know of anything that would force delaying it --- it's not
dependent on querytree redesign, for example. The real question is,
do we have anyone who's committed to do the work? I heard a lot of
discussion but I didn't hear anyone taking responsibility for it...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2000-06-13 14:54:27 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-13 14:45:07 | Re: trim() spec |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2000-06-13 14:54:27 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-06-13 14:38:54 | Small patch for memory leak in src/backend/catalog/pg_proc.c |