Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PORTS] Status of Linux/Strongarm?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Ted Nolan SRI Augusta GA <ted(at)ags(dot)ga(dot)erg(dot)sri(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Status of Linux/Strongarm?
Date: 1999-11-04 16:17:07
Message-ID: 3821B183.3F9A9C5B@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
> The only mention of the strongarm processor that I can find on the
> lists is a test-and-set patch this last March for Postgres on
> Netbsd/Strongarm.  The patch seems to have made it into 6.5.1, so I
> assume NetBsd/Strongarm is now "supported".  How about
> Linux/Strongarm?  Has anyone built on that yet?  Any problems?  (I'd just
> try it, but we don't have the strongarm systems yet..)

Let me know what you find out. I don't show netbsd/strongarm as
supported, but maybe I missed a report on the mailing list...

                      - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart				lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Aaron HeldDate: 1999-11-04 18:25:09
Subject: Successful install
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 1999-11-04 14:34:41
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Problems with OS/2 Port

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group