Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Sergio A(dot) Kessler" <ser(at)perio(dot)unlp(dot)edu(dot)ar>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
Date: 1999-10-11 15:17:46
Message-ID: 3801FF9A.D88C446E@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> Yes, we have discussed this, and will add it to the TODO list.
> > can the commands createuser and destroyuser be renamed to
> > pg_createuser and pg_destroyuser (as pg_dump) adding soft links to
> > preserve backwards compatibility (declaring previous commands
> > deprecated) ?
> > the same can be done for createdb and destroydb ...

I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with
underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming
apocalypse ;)

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 1999-10-11 15:24:38 Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-10-11 14:59:25 Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-11 15:43:33 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
Previous Message Peter Mount 1999-10-11 14:04:53 RE: [INTERFACES] i18n in JDBC driver