Re: [Review] pgbench duration option

From: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ragnar <gnari(at)hive(dot)is>
Subject: Re: [Review] pgbench duration option
Date: 2008-09-08 18:40:39
Message-ID: 37ed240d0809081140p7a2529efsfdf064ef7e38d90d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:59 PM, ITAGAKI Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Here is a revised version of the pgbench duration patch.
> I merged some comments from Brendan and gnari.
>

The changes look good. I tried out the new v3 patch and didn't
encounter any problems.

One last minor quibble - I think the wording in the documentation is
still a little bit awkward:

In the first place, <emphasis>never</> believe any test that runs
for only a few seconds. Use the <literal>-t</> or <literal>-T</>
setting enough
to make the run last at least a few minutes, so as to average out noise.

This reads better IMHO if you simply omit the word "enough".

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Korry Douglas 2008-09-08 19:04:23 Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-08 18:18:16 Re: [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery