Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Consistent \d commands in psql

From: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Consistent \d commands in psql
Date: 2008-03-31 15:27:31
Message-ID: 37ed240d0803310827v5cf91cbemc76dfb42da28cc4f@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On 01/04/2008, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> ...  That means
>  there'd be no way to replicate the all-functions-of-both-types behavior
>  that has been the default in every prior release.

>         \dfS    -> sys functions only
>         \dfU    -> user functions only
>         \dfSU   -> all functions (should allow \dfUS spelling too)
>         \df     -> behavior proposed by Greg

How about \df* rather than (or in addition to) \dfSU & \dfUS?

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2008-03-31 15:33:42
Subject: Fwd: WIP: CASE statement for PL/pgSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-31 15:10:27
Subject: Re: Consistent \d commands in psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group