| From: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Text <-> C string |
| Date: | 2007-09-21 20:39:21 |
| Message-ID: | 37ed240d0709211339m1e1be9a5u7f474a5e1dcae953@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 9/22/07, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> The canonical way to do it is with
>
> DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(textout, t))
I just noticed a couple of macros defined in src/include/tsearch/ts_utils.h:
#define TextPGetCString(t)
DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(textout, PointerGetDatum(t)))
#define CStringGetTextP(c) DatumGetTextP(DirectFunctionCall1(textin,
CStringGetDatum(c)))
Seems these would actually be convenient in quite a lot of places in
the backend. Is there any downside to moving these two into
src/include/postgres.h?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-09-21 21:02:20 | Re: Text <-> C string |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-09-21 20:33:38 | Re: Text <-> C string |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-09-21 21:02:20 | Re: Text <-> C string |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-09-21 20:33:38 | Re: Text <-> C string |