Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: performance drop on RAID5

From: Rosser Schwarz <rosser(dot)schwarz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexandre Barros <alexandre(at)vectorx(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: postgres performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: performance drop on RAID5
Date: 2005-08-24 16:35:01
Message-ID: 37d451f70508240935315add63@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 8/24/05, Alexandre Barros <alexandre(at)vectorx(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:

> i wouldn't be so stunned if the newer machine was ( say ) twice faster
> than the older server, but over three times faster is disturbing.

RAID5 on so few spindles is a known losing case for PostgreSQL.  You'd
be far, far better off doing a pair of RAID1 sets or a single RAID10
set.

/rls

-- 
:wq

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Chris HooverDate: 2005-08-24 16:56:54
Subject: Some ideas for comment
Previous:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2005-08-24 16:34:51
Subject: Re: Performance for relative large DB

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group