Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
Date: 1999-09-28 09:01:22
Message-ID: 37F083E2.5C40D897@krs.ru (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
"Ansley, Michael" wrote:
> 
> Hi, all,
> 
> Whoever is doing the SSL stuff:
> In postmaster.c, at lines 995, and 1841, there is code that is not wrapped
> in the USE_SSL define.
> 
> Last night I checked out the latest source, and couldn't get it to compile.
> It seems that the function heap_openr() has a new parameter, and there are
> calls that have not been updated yet.  I was a little hesitant to go adding
> stuff, as the new parameter is a LOCKTYPE, and I wouldn't know what locks
> are required where, so I just left well alone.  Any comments on this?  There
> is another function which is paired up with it, but I forget the name, which
> also has a new parameter, it seems, and also has calls which have not yet
> been updated.

I fixed all this yesterday while committing my WAL changes...

Vadim

In response to

  • Latest tree at 1999-09-28 08:39:18 from Ansley, Michael

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 1999-09-28 09:54:48
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
Previous:From: Ansley, MichaelDate: 1999-09-28 08:39:18
Subject: Latest tree

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: ciprut ethanDate: 1999-09-28 09:29:16
Subject:
Previous:From: Ansley, MichaelDate: 1999-09-28 08:39:18
Subject: Latest tree

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group