Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Uncle George <gatgul(at)voicenet(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Date: 1999-09-23 22:39:06
Message-ID: 37EAAC0A.D979D50D@wgcr.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Can anyone address the status of this bug?
[actual bug text snipped...]

Wow, Bruce.  That's an old thread.  I'll just say this -- 6.5.1 with
Uncle George and Ryan Kirkpatrick's patchset applied passes regression
at RedHat on their alpha development machine (for the RPM distribution).

Whether the current pre-6.6 tree passes regression or not, I can't say.

The author of the original message you replied to is gat -- AKA Uncle
George.

Lamar OWen
WGCR Internet Radio

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1999-09-24 00:31:47
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-09-23 22:04:28
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Port Bug Report: connection to the backend is lost while using a rule

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Philip WarnerDate: 1999-09-23 23:29:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RI and NULL's
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-09-23 22:01:33
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group