Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PORTS] NT-Compile-Hints

From: Elmar Haneke <elmar(at)haneke(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] NT-Compile-Hints
Date: 1999-08-03 07:25:15
Message-ID: 37A6995B.3B6C7391@haneke.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Bruce Momjian schrieb:
> 
> > > > Especially b) results in an small note in the right place (unknown
> > > > parameter for sort) and an error-stop later.
> > > >
> > > > Elmar
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have added item B.  Please tell me why the HAVE_UNION_SEMUN was not
> > > set properly for NT.  configure runs a test for that.  Any idea why it
> > > failed.
> >
> > I did install the IPC-headers to /usr/local/include/sys
> > The check for semun does fail because of missing headers.
> > The later compile does find the headers.
> 
> OK, how is the later compile different.  Do we need to add some special
> compile flags?  Which ones?

In template\cygwin32 i see

SRCH_INC:/usr/local/include

this does explicitely add /usr/local/include to the include-path in
the makefiles there is -I/usr/local/include added to the
compile-commands.

Elmar

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Uncle GeorgeDate: 1999-08-03 11:19:35
Subject: [Fwd: RH60+ALPHA + >2gig filesizes]
Previous:From: postgresDate: 1999-08-03 07:05:48
Subject: i love this db

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group