| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Uncle George <gatgul(at)voicenet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
| Date: | 1999-07-23 13:47:11 |
| Message-ID: | 3798725F.FB82E0F5@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
> But I think that a computer has no right to any "damn order" it
> wants to, particular if its the same src & test facilities.
Now that you mention it, it isn't the same source since we use some
Unix library sorting routines. It is fairly common for us to see
ordering differences between platforms, which is why you see so many
"order by" clauses in the regression tests. We can add one more (send
patches? :) and you would never know there was a difference in
underlying behavior...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 1999-07-23 14:14:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Phantom row from aggregate in self-join in 6.5 |
| Previous Message | Peter Galbavy | 1999-07-23 13:46:44 | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-07-23 14:37:39 | Re: [PORTS] 6.5 not running on Solaris 2.5.1 SPARC |
| Previous Message | Peter Galbavy | 1999-07-23 13:46:44 | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |