Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ADO and ODBC: More

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "NTB Technical Support" <techsupport(at)ntb(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ADO and ODBC: More
Date: 2001-07-05 18:18:42
Message-ID: 3779.994357122@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
"NTB Technical Support" <techsupport(at)ntb(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>> I'd write it off as broken code in ADO, and program around it by not
>> using column names that require quoting.  Ugly answer, but it's not
>> clear that you have an alternative (short of waiting for an ADO fix).

> I just don't fancy modifying all those hundreds of pages of
> code... And it works with SQL Server, so that would have to be broken
> in a compatible fashion!

It does eh?  Hmm, that suggests that there is *some* way to make the
right thing happen.  Anyone know how Microsoft's version of
SQLColAttributes acts with such names?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-07-06 00:20:52
Subject: Re: ADO and ODBC: More
Previous:From: NTB Technical SupportDate: 2001-07-05 17:29:31
Subject: Re: ADO and ODBC: More

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group