Re: [HACKERS] Perl library (was Building Postgres)

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Brian E Gallew <geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu>, Edmund Mergl <E(dot)Mergl(at)bawue(dot)de>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Perl library (was Building Postgres)
Date: 1999-06-29 15:28:08
Message-ID: 3778E608.D53750FB@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Wouldn't it be better to create a CPAN package and distribute it from
> *there*? I realize that this method has the problem that package
> updates and PostgreSQL updates could become desynchronized, but I
> think this would address the issue adequately.

Well, the problem I'm trying to solve is rpm packaging, which is not
necessarily the same as solving the perl distribution issue.
However...

Would a CPAN package be more amenable to an rpm packaging? That is, if
we had a CPAN distribution (generated locally, of course), could I
plop that into an rpm and have a standard, easy procedure to follow
within the rpm to get the stuff extracted and installed onto a
machine?? I'm blissfully ignorant about CPAN and the packaging
conventions, but would like suggestions.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-06-29 15:52:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Mess
Previous Message Brian E Gallew 1999-06-29 14:52:34 Re: [HACKERS] acl problem in NetBSD/m68k