Re: [PORTS] Port Bug Report: Would not build with -O2 flags set

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ritch Azocar <admin(at)dqu(dot)cc(dot)ca(dot)us>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Port Bug Report: Would not build with -O2 flags set
Date: 1999-06-07 14:26:20
Message-ID: 375BD68C.68A051A0@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

> > Sure. But gcc support for Alphas has been around for years, so
> > imho the most likely cause for the difference is a size issue in
> > Postgres, not an inability on the part of gcc to optimize code.
> But he is running egcs alpha, not gcc alpha.

*shrug* They started out as the same thing. I was guessing at the
nature of the problem; we'll see what it turns out to be...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-07 14:39:29 Re: [PORTS] Port Bug Report: Include file mismatch: stdio.h, std
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-07 13:21:04 Re: [PORTS] Port Bug Report: Would not build with -O2 flags set