Re: vacuumlo.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Grant <grant(at)conprojan(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuumlo.
Date: 2001-07-31 02:21:32
Message-ID: 3721.996546092@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Grant <grant(at)conprojan(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Can you see a scenario where a programmer would forget to delete the
> data from pg_largeobject and the database becoming very large filled
> with orphaned large objects?

Sure. My point wasn't that the functionality isn't needed, it's that
I'm not sure vacuumlo does it well enough to be ready to promote to
the status of mainstream code. It needs more review and testing before
we can move it out of /contrib.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-07-31 04:16:23 Re: vacuumlo.
Previous Message Grant 2001-07-31 01:52:10 Re: vacuumlo.