Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 'Ben Grimm' <bgrimm(at)zaeon(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Pfau <T(dot)Pfau(at)emCrit(dot)com>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec
Date: 2002-03-15 18:36:16
Message-ID: 3705826352029646A3E91C53F7189E325184DB@sectorbase2.sectorbase.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
> Attached is a patch against current CVS that fixes both of the known
> problems with sequences: failure to flush XLOG after a transaction

Great! Thanks... and sorry for missing these cases year ago -:)

Vadim

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg CopelandDate: 2002-03-15 18:47:20
Subject: Re: Client/Server compression?
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2002-03-15 18:06:57
Subject: Re: Time for 7.2.1?

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Clark C . EvansDate: 2002-03-16 01:54:02
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec
Previous:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2002-03-15 16:27:41
Subject: Re: Bug #620: create index ... (date_part('year', d)) fails

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group