Re: PGCon 2008 RFP

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGCon 2008 RFP
Date: 2008-12-30 22:27:34
Message-ID: 36e682920812301427h691dc958o525ebd53fe23108d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Are they 10x faster than Postgres conferences?

Heh, no. That's one performance metric Postgres has them beat at :)
Unless of course, you could find enough good PG content to fill a few
hundred sessions a day for an entire week.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin M. Roy 2008-12-30 22:33:18 Re: PGCon 2008 RFP
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-12-30 22:24:51 Re: PGCon 2008 RFP