| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | justin <justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Brian Hurt" <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
| Date: | 2008-12-15 14:17:03 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920812150617j14f4f455p41024f4cacf5c677@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Well, then the first order of business would be to write a benchmark kit. I
> have been thinking for a while that we should make our own maintained
> version of the DBT+* suite, or whatever other suite is appropriate. And
> then start running it.
Agreed. For a start on TPC-C, EnterpriseDB has a closer version of the kit.
> The rest of this discussion, while interesting, cannot really lead to any
> improvements, because none of the results and analyses can be published.
> Like, you know, "I have these great insights into important problems, but I
> cannot tell you about them."
I will soon tell you, because Oracle gave me permission to publish.
> Is it possible to write a possibly eventually compliant benchmark kit under
> open-source terms?
I believe so.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-12-15 15:29:25 | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-12-15 08:53:47 | Re: [GENERAL] Releasing new version of PostgreSQL Live CD |