| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "kevin kempter" <kevin(at)kevinkempterllc(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Federated Postgresql architecture ? |
| Date: | 2008-06-27 02:05:14 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920806261905h52e394e4i8ba1094342c6c43b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Sure, what do you think pl/proxy is for?
Well, considering that an application must be written specifically to
make use of it, and for very specific scenarios, I wouldn't consider
it as making PostgreSQL a federated database. The pl/proxy
architecture certainly doesn't resemble federated in the sense of the
other database vendors.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-06-27 02:17:50 | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-06-26 23:15:23 | Re: Hardware vs Software Raid |