Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hardware vs Software RAID

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter T(dot) Breuer" <ptb(at)inv(dot)it(dot)uc3m(dot)es>, "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware vs Software RAID
Date: 2008-06-25 15:30:14
Message-ID: 36e682920806250830o2de2e040lb1976aacb48f670b@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> SMART doesn't detect 100% of drive failures in advance, but you'd be silly
> to setup a database system where you don't get to take advantage of the
> ~50% it does catch before you lose any data.

Can't argue with that one.

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-06-25 15:35:28
Subject: Re: Hardware vs Software RAID
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2008-06-25 15:24:23
Subject: Re: Hardware vs Software RAID

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group