Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch
Date: 2008-04-01 12:17:57
Message-ID: 36e682920804010517n36cdffc3hffdd7a5fe44b0033@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I can't to say so plpgpsm is an dialect of plpgsql. Minimally there
> are different parser. I am sure so supported functions can be shared,
> but it's mean really dramatic changes in plpgsql code. I belive so
> separated languages will be more maintainable.

I agree. I think it should be a separate language as well.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-04-01 12:21:46 build multiple indexes in single table pass?
Previous Message tomas 2008-04-01 12:02:14 Re: [HACKERS] Avahi support for Postgresql