Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Revised xml memory allocation patch

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Revised xml memory allocation patch
Date: 2008-01-15 16:58:08
Message-ID: 36e682920801150858h28ce5922l43b585b0d57623c7@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Jan 15, 2008 5:04 AM, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:
> > Any thoughts whether to apply or not?
>
> Seems like a much more sane approach to me -- +1.

Agreed, sounds and looks better to me.  +1

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation                | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor          | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837                        | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2008-01-15 16:58:20
Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Previous:From: Stefan SchwarzerDate: 2008-01-15 16:41:31
Subject: Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group