Re: Performance problems with prepared statements

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with prepared statements
Date: 2007-10-10 19:55:07
Message-ID: 36e682920710101255n5760a009v8fdbf42e4599f16f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 10/10/07, Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za> wrote:
> When running the query directly from psql it returns the required rows
> in less than 100 milli-seconds.
>
> However, when using a prepared statement from my C application on the
> above query and executing it the query duration is as follows
> ...
> Row[s] = 25, Duration = 435409.474 ms
>

How are you timing it? Does it really take 435 seconds to complete?
Try the following in psql:

postgres# PREPARE yourplan (VARCHAR, INT, INT) AS
SELECT oid, * FROM calllog
WHERE calllog_mainteng = $1
AND calllog_phase = $2
AND calllog_self < $3
OR calllog_mainteng = $1
AND calllog_phase < 8
ORDER BY calllog_mainteng DESC,
calllog_phase DESC,
calllog_self DESC limit 25;

postgres# EXECUTE yourplan('124 ', 8, 366942);

--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Kramer 2007-10-10 20:08:30 Re: Performance problems with prepared statements
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-10-10 19:52:25 Re: hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan