| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Bernier" <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Ron Peterson" <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-08-28 16:27:11 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920708280927t53e649b4qf4b881d7a618fcf9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 8/28/07, Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> wrote:
> How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0' reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work involved out of the debate for the moment)?
+1
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-08-28 16:34:26 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-08-28 16:25:49 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |