Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Dan Gorman" <dgorman(at)hi5(dot)com>
Cc: "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Mark Lewis" <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
Date: 2006-06-15 05:38:18
Message-ID: 36e682920606142238l6a86f998w25979e6284a250a8@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 6/15/06, Jonah H. Harris <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/15/06, Dan Gorman <dgorman(at)hi5(dot)com> wrote:
> > shelfs. Any generic advice other than the NetApp (their NFS oracle
> > tuning options) that might be useful? (e.g. turning off snapshots)
>
> I was using PostgreSQL on a 980c, but feature-wise they're probably
> pretty close.
>
> What type of application are you running?  OLTP?  If so, what type of
> transaction volume?  Are you planning to use any Flex* or Snap*
> features?  What type of volume layouts are you using?

Also, you mentioned NFS... is that what you were planning?  If you
licensed iSCSI, it's a bit better for the database from a performance
angle.

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation            | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor            | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830            | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2006-06-15 05:51:34
Subject: Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
Previous:From: Jonah H. HarrisDate: 2006-06-15 05:35:43
Subject: Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group