Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_class catalog question...

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...
Date: 2006-03-31 15:36:22
Message-ID: 36e682920603310736w27d8d3dao3fb3a6ff3690c532@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3/31/06, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> wrote:
> What if you put your char[64] before relhassubclass, then you
> don't change CLASS_TUPLE_SIZE.

Thought about that... but it would be an ugly place for this column. 
I know I could get around it by renumbering the attribute, but that's
just a kludge.

Now that I've had some sleep, I'm sure I'll get it working :)

--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-03-31 15:41:18
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-03-31 15:35:31
Subject: Re: Slony-I for circular replication

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group