From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ice-broker scan thread |
Date: | 2005-11-29 04:51:30 |
Message-ID: | 36e682920511282051q432bb176r24f4a025b2f16d40@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
FYI, I've personally used Oracle 9.2.0.4's async IO on Linux and have seen
several installations which make use of it also.
On 11/28/05, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > > I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async
> IO
> >
> > Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have
> > to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting
> > this in. Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not
> > worth the trouble.
>
> The architecture I am looking at would not rely on threads.
>
> I didn't want to jump on list and waive my hands until I had something to
> show, but since Qingqing is looking at the issue I thought I better raise
> it.
>
> Gavin
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-11-29 04:52:38 | Re: ice-broker scan thread |
Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-11-29 04:49:42 | Re: ice-broker scan thread |