Re: [HACKERS] Re: NULL & NOT NULL

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: NULL & NOT NULL
Date: 1998-12-29 15:44:29
Message-ID: 3688F8DD.294E1B0B@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This NULL clause is not part of constraints it is a default option and
> we already support it,
> prova=> CREATE TABLE table1 (field1 INTEGER DEFAULT NULL);
> CREATE

That is certainly a clearer way of specifying it. Should we forget about
the other syntax?

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 1998-12-29 16:04:26 Open for suggestions - IOW: HELP!
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-12-29 15:41:17 Re: [Fwd: postgresql-v6.4 - m88k svr4]