Re: [HACKERS] bug(?) if int8 as primary key

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: David Sauer <davids(at)iol(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bug(?) if int8 as primary key
Date: 1998-12-23 14:56:15
Message-ID: 3681048F.5BE33D7C@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> david=> create table t( i int8 primary key );
> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index t_pkey
> for table t
> ERROR: Can't find a default operator class for type 20.

int8 is a new data type, and I did not create the functions and catalog
entries required to implement a b-tree index yet. Since int8 relies on
compiler support for 8 byte integers, I wasn't sure how many platforms
would actually be able to compile the type. I think we know now that
most platforms do support the data type, so we should have more complete
support for it in the next release.

> If I restart pgsql, I can create table t (with int as primary key, not
> int8).

Yes, that's funny. It apparently does not quite clean up after itself.
The good news is that you only have to restart your session, not the
postmaster :)

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Broytmann 1998-12-23 15:33:14 Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 1998-12-23 14:10:16 Re: [HACKERS] bug(?) if int8 as primary key