Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT
Date: 1998-12-01 02:51:58
Message-ID: 366359CE.E6F2769C@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while on the redolog, I've came across a little detail I'm in
> doubt about. Currently it seems, that the 'C' response to the
> frontend is sent before the transaction get's really
> committed in the backend. So there is a little chance that
> the backend dies between this response and the
> CommitTransaction() call.
>
> Isn't that the wrong order? As a programmer I would assume,
> that if I have positive response to COMMIT, I can forget my
> local data because it made it safely into the database.

Yes, this should be fixed...

Vadim

In response to

  • COMMIT at 1998-11-30 16:38:00 from Jan Wieck

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-12-01 04:26:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] cursor and update + view
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-12-01 02:50:44 Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding...