Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Peter Galbavy" <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Date: 2003-04-10 13:57:41
Message-ID: 3625.1049983061@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
"Peter Galbavy" <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net> writes:
> Is there any message - speaking from a standpoint of a normal user and not a
> source hacker WRT postgresql - where knowing the length of the response is
> either unknown or is expensive (in buffering) to find out ?

See my response to ljb --- I think that in practice people assemble each
message before sending anyway.  If you don't do it that way, you've got
a problem with recovering if you hit an error condition after sending a
partial message.

			regards, tom lane


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Steve CrawfordDate: 2003-04-10 15:55:01
Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2003-04-10 13:12:56
Subject: Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: guru prasadDate: 2003-04-10 14:39:00
Subject: Re: Memory leak!!
Previous:From: Himmet KaramanDate: 2003-04-10 13:06:23
Subject: PLEASE HELP ME URGENT about choosing only the ones that i want while entering the data to postgresql with pgaccess on linux or windows or pgadmin II

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group