Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] patching utilities?

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patching utilities?
Date: 1998-10-02 16:52:29
Message-ID: 361504CD.EE8E846E@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Is it too late to consider distributing a patching mechanism with 
> > the upcoming release?
> The Developer's FAQ mentions our difforig, cporig, rmorig tools.  To
> apply the patch, just use any standard patch program, no?

OK, I'll look at those...

I'm also suggesting that we have a convention for and place to put the
patch collections, say a directory "patch" just under the main tree.
Then we can distribute tarballs and patch files which just need to be
generated and unpacked in a single location to succeed.

                     - Tom

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 1998-10-02 17:31:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Previous:From: TaralDate: 1998-10-02 16:47:48
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group