| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] patching utilities? |
| Date: | 1998-10-02 16:52:29 |
| Message-ID: | 361504CD.EE8E846E@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Is it too late to consider distributing a patching mechanism with
> > the upcoming release?
> The Developer's FAQ mentions our difforig, cporig, rmorig tools. To
> apply the patch, just use any standard patch program, no?
OK, I'll look at those...
I'm also suggesting that we have a convention for and place to put the
patch collections, say a directory "patch" just under the main tree.
Then we can distribute tarballs and patch files which just need to be
generated and unpacked in a single location to succeed.
- Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-10-02 17:31:18 | Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) |
| Previous Message | Taral | 1998-10-02 16:47:48 | RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) |