Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 01/03/2013 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does anyone have an objection to fixing the pg_upgrade test script
>> to suppress the TCP socket?
> Should be OK. We can't do that on Windows, though, so please make it
> conditional so we don't break Mingw buildfarm members. The test script
> already contains a few Windows variants.
I'm planning to do it like this:
+case $testhost in
+ MINGW*) LISTEN_ADDRESSES="localhost" ;;
+ *) LISTEN_ADDRESSES="" ;;
+POSTMASTER_OPTS="-F -c listen_addresses=$LISTEN_ADDRESSES"
which matches the existing Windows-specific switches.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dan Langille||Date: 2013-01-04 02:01:01|
|Subject: PGCon 2013 - CFP & unconference day|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2013-01-03 22:45:11|
|Subject: Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation