Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 01/03/2013 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does anyone have an objection to fixing the pg_upgrade test script
>> to suppress the TCP socket?

> Should be OK. We can't do that on Windows, though, so please make it 
> conditional so we don't break Mingw buildfarm members. The test script 
> already contains a few Windows variants.

I'm planning to do it like this:

 testhost=`uname -s`
 
+case $testhost in
+	MINGW*)	LISTEN_ADDRESSES="localhost" ;;
+	*)		LISTEN_ADDRESSES="" ;;
+esac
+
+POSTMASTER_OPTS="-F -c listen_addresses=$LISTEN_ADDRESSES"
+
 temp_root=$PWD/tmp_check

which matches the existing Windows-specific switches.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: pg_upgrade test script creates port conflicts in parallel testing at 2013-01-03 18:36:15 from Andrew Dunstan

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Dan Langille	Date: 2013-01-04 02:01:01
	Subject: PGCon 2013 - CFP & unconference day
Previous:	From: Joshua D. Drake	Date: 2013-01-03 22:45:11
	Subject: Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database"