| From: | David Hartwig <daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names |
| Date: | 1998-08-06 13:14:44 |
| Message-ID: | 35C9AC44.91BB9A8C@insightdist.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Peter T Mount wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###.
> >
> > I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent
> > namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators.
> >
> > However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large
> > object users. As I see there are going to be other new large object
> > things in 6.4, it may not be an issue.
> >
> > Is is OK to rename them internally?
>
> Shouldn't be a problem. JDBC does refer to the xin prefix with the
> getTables method, so it's simply a single change there.
>
The same goes for ODBC.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-06 15:34:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names |
| Previous Message | t-ishii | 1998-08-06 09:24:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Broken source tree |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sferacarta Software | 1998-08-06 14:09:20 | Re: [SQL] Creating table with unique key. |
| Previous Message | Antonio Garcia Mari | 1998-08-06 09:17:13 | Re: [INTERFACES] Accessing PostgreSQL server on linux from windows NT server |