Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report - working

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: "(PostgreSQL-development)" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report - working
Date: 1998-08-01 01:20:15
Message-ID: 35C26D4F.31C3EFB1@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The test machine (actually my desktop) has been running the cvsup'd
> version since I set ip up a couple of weeks ago. The production
> machine was running 6.3. The INSTALL file says dumping the db wasn't
> necessary yet I had to - it wouldn't run without it and complained
> about the older database. Is dumping going to be required for 6.4?

Of course :)

Also, things like the installation docs are the last to be updated
before a release since they need to accurately match the actual release.
Pretty much a waste of time in between...

> Also are indexes working for floats when the query uses BETWEEN?

Probably. The "BETWEEN" becomes an "AND" clause.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 1998-08-01 01:21:44 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report - working
Previous Message Maarten Boekhold 1998-07-31 20:05:40 Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug?