Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Constraints in PostgreSQL

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: David Maclean <david(at)cm(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Constraints in PostgreSQL
Date: 1998-07-10 07:32:24
Message-ID: 35A5C388.F042A188@krs.ru (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Maclean wrote:
> 
> Will the primary, foreign and check constraints be fully implemented in
> the 6.4 release. As of 6.3.2 only primary keys in the table create are
> implemented. The alter table statement lacks these.
> 
> Is there someone that is implementing this and when.

I have some hope that low-level locking (LLL) could be implemented
in 6.4 and so FOREIGN should be postponed...
I'll post more words about LLL & 6.4 in the next week -:)

As for PRIMARY & CHECK in ALTER TABLE - this would be nice
to have them but no one does it, AFAIK.

Vadim

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-07-10 11:36:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Leaving for vacation
Previous:From: David MacleanDate: 1998-07-10 06:18:59
Subject: Constraints in PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group