Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: profiling connection overhead

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead
Date: 2010-11-30 20:49:07
Message-ID: 3599.1291150147@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On mn, 2010-11-29 at 13:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Rolling in calloc in place of
>> malloc/memset made no particular difference either, which says that
>> Fedora 13's glibc does not have any optimization for that case as I'd
>> hoped.

> glibc's calloc is either mmap of /dev/zero or malloc followed by memset.

Hmm.  I would have expected to see a difference then.  Do you know what
conditions are needed to cause the mmap to be used?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-11-30 20:52:36
Subject: Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-11-30 20:34:42
Subject: Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group