Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Aside from the lwlock business, Karel seems to be seeing some problem
>> in to_timestamp/to_date.

> I thought Karel sent in a to_date patch yesterday that you applied.  Was
> there another issue?

Yes.  He reported something that looked a lot like a DST boundary
problem, except it wasn't on a DST boundary date.  Thomas thought it
might be a consequence of the timestamp-vs-timestamptz change from
7.1 to 7.2.  See http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1345390

(BTW, is anyone else noticing that fts.postgresql.org is missing an
awful lot of traffic?  For example, I can't get it to show Thomas'
comment on the above-mentioned thread; and that is *VERY* far from
being its only omission lately.)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: RC1 time? at 2002-01-04 06:39:38 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: RC1 time? at 2002-01-04 06:52:45 from Bruce Momjian
• Re: RC1 time? at 2002-01-04 07:48:04 from Oleg Bartunov
• Re: RC1 time? at 2002-01-05 06:47:50 from Marc G. Fournier

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2002-01-04 06:52:45
	Subject: Re: RC1 time?
Previous:	From: Christopher Kings-Lynne	Date: 2002-01-04 06:46:53
	Subject: freebsd/alpha probs