Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> You can't have subtransactions inside an implicit transaction block,

It would be folly to design on that assumption.  We *will* have that
situation just as soon as plpgsql allows creating subtransactions
(which I trust you'll agree will happen soon).  All you have to do
is call such a function from a bare SELECT.  I do not think you'll
be able to legislate that people must say BEGIN first.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All at 2004-07-02 21:30:49 from Alvaro Herrera

Responses

• Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All at 2004-07-03 02:59:11 from Alvaro Herrera

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Oliver Jowett	Date: 2004-07-03 00:16:50
	Subject: Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions
Previous:	From: Jeroen T. Vermeulen	Date: 2004-07-02 23:33:42
	Subject: Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions