| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] COPY .... WITH (FORMAT binary) causes syntax error at or near "binary" |
| Date: | 2011-07-05 15:30:04 |
| Message-ID: | 3533.1309879804@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> I assume it's not in unreserved_keyword because it would cause a
>> shift/reduce conflict elsewhere.
> Yeah. In particular, it conflicts with the ancient copy syntax which
> we still support for backwards compatibility with versions < 7.3. We
> can fix the immediate problem with something like the attached.
> (a) Should we do that?
That seems like a horrid crock ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-07-05 15:34:36 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY .... WITH (FORMAT binary) causes syntax error at or near "binary" |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-05 15:23:11 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY .... WITH (FORMAT binary) causes syntax error at or near "binary" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-05 15:31:38 | Re: Core Extensions relocation |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-05 15:26:12 | Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system |