The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 1998, Simon Shapiro wrote:
> That will not make pgaccess understand non-SELECt SQL, I am afraid.
> It is good enough for now.
PgAccess handles "action queries", but only the saved ones.
Make a new action query, save it, and open it!!!
After a warning window, it will "pg_exec it" not "pg_select" it!
> > > Not sure if that is wise or not, considering that pgaccess has a
> > > new version released *much* more often then PostgreSQL itself, as new
> > > features are added to it...
I will solve this problem soon.
> Fine with me. Do you know why I can only SELECT from pgaccess query
Lack of time :-(
I will look over the code, one of these days
> I do not, but I've CC'd this into the pgsql-interfaces list where the
> author tends to hang out...
No. Had some contracts to work on.
I always keep on eye on pgsql-interfaces and reply when someone in
Had no time to develop further PgAccess (for the moment).
FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA
In response to
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Jose' Soares Da Silva||Date: 1998-03-25 15:31:55|
|Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] About the char16 and char(16);|
|Previous:||From: Constantin Teodorescu||Date: 1998-03-25 10:12:38|
|Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Char types with ODBC and Access 97|