Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [QUESTIONS] Char types with ODBC and Access 97

From: Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: rdboer(at)hrs-rotterdam(dot)nl, spider(at)chatswood(dot)alphanet(dot)net(dot)au, Bugs for PostgreSQL <bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Char types with ODBC and Access 97
Date: 1998-03-25 10:12:38
Message-ID: 3518D896.8AB3AA4@flex.ro (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > I find it also very strange that pgaccess 0.84 is reporting a field size of
> > -5 for varchar type, and psql reports the correct size.
> 
> Yes, this looks like a bug in pgaccess when I ask for Object/Information
> on a table that contains a char().  Perhaps the author could look at
> psql.c to see how we handle these special cases in the \d command.  [I
> am CC'ing the pgaccess author on this.]

Yes. It's a bug.
I'm trying to find some time to fix it.

-- 
Constantin Teodorescu
FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Constantin TeodorescuDate: 1998-03-25 10:55:02
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: pgaccess "exec" queries
Previous:From: Sergey S. KosyakovDate: 1998-03-25 09:04:45
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] update NOT NULL via LIBPQ

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group